Quantifiers, in Linguistics
At exactly the same time, their relative benefits once the coherence connections relies on the kind of commentary. For example, End up in, Condition, and Concession gamble a far more crucial part within the informative creating than just they do in narrative fiction, where temporary relations and additionally, to have nonfinite adverbial conditions, Addition/Concomitance wie trifft man Latinas and Exemplification/Specs take into account a greater amount of adverbial conditions (select Kortmann 1991 for statistics and a dialogue regarding associated literature).
step 3.step 3 Scope and you can Scopal Quantifiers
When a few quantified words occur in identical framework, some semantic affairs could possibly get receive among them phrases (Jackendoff 1971 , Gil 1982b ). Next English sentence, with a couple of numerically quantified NPs, can get, at the very least probably, feel translated in every otherwise every following four ways.
Interpretations (5a) and you can (5b) each other encompass one band of about three males and you may a single group of a couple of lady: all the a couple NPs features separate source. This type of interpretations was appropriately distinguisheded once the non-scope-differentiated, or symmetrical. Perceptions (5c) and you may (5d) present a more cutting-edge visualize. In (5c) there clearly was one group of about three guys; although not, each of the three guys was for the yet another lay off a couple people. Hence, as subject NP has separate resource, the brand new direct-object NP is actually referentially dependent on the topic NP. In this interpretation, after that, the topic NP has scope along the direct-target NP. Way more accurately, the 2 NPs are located in a relationship of distributivity, towards the topic NP because distributive key, therefore the direct-target NP since the distributive display. Within the (5d), an echo-photo disease gets. Here, there’s one number of one or two girls; however, all the a couple of people was associated with a new lay of around three boys. Consequently, as the head-object NP possess separate resource, the topic NP try referentially determined by the fresh head-object NP; the fresh new head-object NP possess range across the subject NP. Here too following, a relationship out of distributivity obtains; now, whether or not, it is the head object NP the distributive key as well as the topic NP the distributive show.
The above five perceptions are not just as available for speakers of English. Particularly, the new symmetric perceptions (5a) and you will (5b) much more easily available than the asymmetric interpretations (5c) and you may (5d). Moreover, within second a couple interpretations, (5c) that have large scope to the topic NP, is much more offered than just (5d) that have wider extent towards lead-target NP. This type of tastes are not accidental; alternatively, he could be style of consequences regarding significantly more standard principles governing this new project from quantifier extent across dialects.
Given the general liking to own symmetrical perceptions, languages typically have within their discretion certain lexical and you can morphosyntactic gizmos whose setting would be to lead to the greater amount of designated asymmetric perceptions, whenever speaking of required. Look at the following the English sentences:
Phrases (6a) and you may (6b) differ about lexical variety of quantifier in the subject NP. While for the (6a), along with, several extent relationships will get get between the two NPs, therefore the quantity of suitcases may vary anywhere between three in total and you may about three for each and every man, inside (6b), with every, the topic NP has scope along side lead object NP, and suitcases # 3 for each and every son. While most of the, instance three, is a simple quantifier, all of the was a great scopal quantifier, that is to say, a beneficial quantifier endowed which have an extra denotational component, one that forces a specific extent link to receive within NP where it happens, and several almost every other expression. In particular, it’s a beneficial distributive-trick quantifier, causing a romance away from distributivity, where in fact the NP containing the fresh new quantifier in question ’s the distributive secret, otherwise element that have wide range (Gil 1995 ).
Schreibe einen Kommentar
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.